Write a report analyzing the treaty agreement ending World War I Both supporters for and opponents of the League of Nations hoped to preserve peace. Using the internet, libraries, or other research sources, identify what each group proposed as a means to secure peace for the United States. Analyze the debate between Wilson and the opponents of the League. Then, construct a series of suggestions for a treaty agreement that would have satisfied both sides. Write a 300 word report that defends your version of the treaty. Use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling. As Woodrow Wilson, how would you have presented your argument for a just peace rather than a peace of vengeance? Be thorough and persuasive, challenging your arguments with those from the opposing side.

The Treaty of Versailles, which ended World War I, remains one of the most controversial peace agreements in history. The treaty's most debated aspect is the creation of the League of Nations, which was advocated by President Woodrow Wilson but met with significant opposition in the US Congress.

Supporters of the League of Nations, primarily idealists, argued that a new world order based on collective security and international cooperation was essential to prevent future conflicts. They proposed an international body that could provide a platform for dialogue, resolve disputes, and enforce peace.

On the other hand, opponents, largely consisted of isolationists and some realists, feared that such an international organization would compromise national sovereignty and entangle the United States in unnecessary foreign conflicts. They advocated for a return to traditional diplomacy, reinforced by economic and military strength to secure peace.

President Wilson envisioned the League of Nations as a pivotal part of his Fourteen Points, which advocated for "peace without victory." This meant a just peace that would rebuild nations without seeking to punish the defeated, particularly Germany. Wilson believed that fostering democracy and self-determination would create a stable European continent and ensure lasting peace.

The opposition, led by Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, argued that the League could force the US to act against its interests or participate in foreign wars. They proposed amendments to the treaty that would preserve the autonomy in deciding when to use American military forces.

To reconcile these views, a revised treaty could include specific clauses that limit the obligations of the United States under the League’s collective security premise. This version would also emphasize the principle of self-determination and economic cooperation without imposing harsh penalties on the defeated powers.

In presenting the case for a balanced treaty, I would, as Woodrow Wilson, stress the dangers of a vengeful peace which might sow the seeds of another war. Instead, I would propose a framework that upholds the dignity of all nations, including the vanquished, while establishing a reliable system for peaceful conflict resolution. By incorporating selective elements from the opponents' perspective, such as a more significant role for Congress in approving military engagements under the League, the revised treaty would aim to bridge the gap between both parties, preventing an absolute defeat for either side.