How could a powerful League of Nations have reacted to the crisis in Ethiopia? Sent a strong message to Hitler warning against the action Used troops to stop Italy taking over the nations Held a conference to discuss the issue Assisted with supplies and needed materials

If a powerful League of Nations existed during the crisis in Ethiopia in the 1930s, it could have pursued several actions to address the situation:

1. Sent a Strong Message to Hitler Warning Against the Action:

 Strategy: Diplomatic pressure and condemnation.

 Impact: This might have served as a deterrent, discouraging further aggression and highlighting the international community's opposition to such actions.

2. Used Troops to Stop Italy Taking Over the Nations:

 Strategy: Military intervention.

 Impact: While a direct military confrontation would have been a more forceful response, it carries significant risks and challenges, including the potential for escalating conflicts.

3. Held a Conference to Discuss the Issue:

 Strategy: Diplomatic dialogue and negotiation.

 Impact: A conference could have provided a platform for diplomatic solutions, facilitating discussions and potentially leading to an agreement that addressed concerns without resorting to military force.

4. Assisted with Supplies and Needed Materials:

 Strategy: Humanitarian and economic support.

 Impact: Providing assistance could have alleviated the impact of aggression on the Ethiopian population, demonstrating solidarity and potentially fostering international collaboration to address the crisis.

The League of Nations faced limitations in its ability to enforce collective security due to the lack of a standing military force and the reluctance of some major powers to intervene. In reality, the League's response to the Italian invasion of Ethiopia was ineffective, highlighting the weaknesses of the organization and contributing to its eventual decline.