A football coach is trying to decide: when a team is ahead late in the game, which strategy is better?

Mathematics · Middle School · Thu Feb 04 2021

Answered on

Deciding between different strategies when a team is ahead late in the game involves considering various factors such as the score difference, the time remaining, the strengths and condition of the team, and the opponent's capabilities. Broadly, there are two general strategies: a conservative approach (often called "running out the clock") and an aggressive approach.

1. Conservative Approach (Running Out the Clock): - This approach involves playing in a way that minimizes risks and focuses on maintaining possession of the ball and wasting time. - The team might run the ball more often in American Football, which keeps the clock moving, especially if they are adept at the ground game. - The defense is usually set up to prevent big plays, often allowing shorter completions that eat up the clock. - Turnovers and penalties are avoided as much as possible, and special teams will try to avoid risky plays.

2. Aggressive Approach: - The aggressive approach involves continuing to play offensively as if the score were tied or as if they were behind. - This could mean a team continues to pass the ball in American Football and try to score additional points, keeping pressure on the opponent. - The idea is to expand the lead and diminish the chance of the opponent making a comeback, but it comes with risks such as turnovers or stopping the clock on incomplete passes.

The appropriate strategy depends on the context. If the lead is small and the opponent has a high-powered offense, a conservative approach might not be sufficient to secure the victory. If the lead is substantial and the team's defense is performing well a conservative strategy might be the safer bet to ensure a win.