Which word shows the author's feelings about Kircher's ideas? A.nonsense B.mark C.certain D.volumes

To identify the word that shows the author's feelings about Kircher's ideas, you need to understand the context of the sentence and the meanings of the options provided.

1. Analyze the sentence where these words are used to discern the tone the author is adopting towards Kircher's ideas. Is it positive, negative, or neutral? 2. Consider the definitions of the options given: - Nonsense: something that is not true or logical; foolish or unacceptable behavior or thought. - Mark: a visible impression or trace on something, typically used to indicate a standard of quality or an achievement; not typically associated with expressing feelings directly. - Certain: being sure about something; without doubt. - Volumes: books or a series of books; not usually a word that directly conveys emotion by itself. 3. After considering the context and the meanings, the word that seems to best fit an expression of the author's feelings is likely to be "nonsense" if the author had a negative view of Kircher's ideas.

However, without additional context, it is difficult to confirm which word would be the correct answer. If the sentence criticizes or dismisses Kircher's ideas, then "nonsense" would be indicative of the author’s negative feelings. Meanwhile, "certain" could indicate a positive belief or agreement if the context suggests that the author views the ideas as true or correct. "Mark" and "volumes" do not inherently express the author's feelings unless used in a specific manner that the context would reveal.

Understanding tone and inference is crucial when reading and analyzing texts. An author's tone can be positive, negative, or neutral and helps convey their attitude towards the subject. When we look at a word that is supposed to show feelings, we’re often referring to descriptors that give emotional context or demonstrate an opinion.

For students, it's essential to improve vocabulary and reading comprehension skills which aid in recognizing tone and evaluating subtle cues in the text. In the given scenario, if the word "nonsense" were chosen, it denotes that the author disapproves or mocks Kircher's ideas. Athanasius Kircher was a scholar with a wide range of interests, and while his work was groundbreaking in some areas, it was sometimes seen as overly speculative or incorrect by later standards. Authors often express their standings on historical figures using tone, phrasing, and word choice. Recognizing this can offer a deeper understanding of the text's implications and the author's intent