Which headquarters level looks more broadly at assessment within their area of responsibility and often concentrates assessment efforts on determining whether progress has been made toward accomplishing the missio?

The higher headquarters level typically takes on the responsibility of looking more broadly at assessments within their area of responsibility. Specifically, in military and other large organizational contexts, a command at a higher echelon—such as a division, corps, theater, or strategic command headquarters—will often concentrate assessment efforts on strategic or operational outcomes. This means their focus is on determining whether overall progress has been made towards accomplishing the mission. They seek to understand the big picture and how various components and efforts contribute to overarching objectives. They're less concerned with the minute details of day-to-day activities, which are typically monitored by lower-level headquarters, and are more focused on long-term goals, trends, and strategic impacts.

Extra: In military and organizational structures, assessment is a key process at all levels of command. However, the scope and focus of the assessments vary by level.

1. Lower-level headquarters: At this level, the focus is often on the execution of specific tasks and the immediate tactics of units. They are looking at the "how" of mission accomplishment—how efficiently and effectively their units are performing the tasks assigned to them.

2. Mid-level headquarters: This level starts to integrate the efforts of multiple lower-level units and looks at how well the pieces fit together. They may be involved in operational-level assessments, making sure that the combined efforts of the different units are coordinated and that they’re on track to achieve certain objectives within the operational area.

3. Higher-level headquarters: As your question indicates, this level is concerned with the broader perspective. Here, assessment involves strategic-level considerations, such as whether the overall strategy is working, if the mission objectives are still relevant and achievable, and what adjustments might be needed to ensure success. They measure progress towards the end goals and often rely on comprehensive metrics and analyses to gauge effectiveness.

In any large complex organization, effective assessment is a continuous process and requires clear communication channels so that insights at one level can inform decisions at another. This ensures that strategic goals are aligned with operational activities and tactical tasks, creating a coherent effort towards the overall mission of the organization.