The Krisp Kracker company which makes unique kettle chips for restaurants, clubs and events, has just lost a large client that made up 55% of its total revenue. Management finds it necessary to reduce staff or wages. This comes only three months after hiring 35 new people to support this big client. While there are rumors of wage reductions in the short run, the 100 employees who have been with the company for the past two years are grumbling that they are more valuable than the new hires who should be let go and the wages not reduced. The situation at Krisp Kracker illustrates which wage stickiness theory is best? A. Implicit contract theory B. Insider-outsider model C. Relative wage coordination argument

Business · High School · Wed Jan 13 2021

Answered on

The situation at Krisp Kracker, where the long-term employees argue that they are more valuable than the new hires who should be let go, aligns closely with the Insider-outsider model of wage stickiness.

The Insider-outsider model suggests that there's a divide between established, "insider" workers and newer, "outsider" employees. Insiders, typically those with longer tenure or stronger connections to the company, often resist wage reductions or layoffs, claiming their value to the company is higher due to their experience and contributions. This model emphasizes the resistance of established employees to wage reductions or layoffs compared to newer hires, as observed in the situation described at Krisp Kracker.

Related Questions