Does the author suggest that the concerns of the Leave campaign mirror those of Parliament from over 400 years ago?

To properly address this question, we would need to refer to a specific text or context in which the author's views are presented. If the author indeed suggests that the concerns of the Leave campaign—the movement advocating for the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union (Brexit)—mirror those of the English Parliament from over 400 years ago, they may be drawing parallels between contemporary issues and historical events.

For example, over 400 years ago, during the Elizabethan era, issues of national sovereignty, self-governance, and foreign influence were significant considerations for the English Parliament. The author may argue that such concerns are echoed in the modern Leave campaign’s arguments that touch upon the desire for the UK to regain legislative autonomy from EU regulatory frameworks, control immigration more tightly, or make independent trade agreements.

To provide a definitive answer, one would need to examine the specific claims, arguments, or text where the author discusses these ideas. In the context of a discussion about Brexit, it is not uncommon for commentators to draw historical analogies to frame contemporary debates within a broader narrative of national sovereignty and identity.

In the context of Brexit, the Leave campaign focused on similar themes, albeit in a vastly different world. They argued that EU membership diluted the UK’s sovereignty, especially regarding laws, trade, and immigration. The Leave campaign posited that by exiting the EU, Britain could take back control of its legislative process, regulate its own economy, and secure its borders in accordance to its own priorities and values.

These issues tend to resonate with a portion of the public that values historical notions of national identity and autonomy. By drawing comparisons between the present-day UK and its historical struggle for self-governance, supporters of the Leave campaign created a narrative that Brexit was a reclaiming of Britain's historical legacy as a sovereign and independent nation.