Answered on
An ethical dilemma involving work quality could arise when an employee is asked to complete a task in an unreasonably short timeframe, which would inevitably lead to lower quality work. Here's how the dilemma might unfold:
1. An employee, let's call them Alex, works for a company that prides itself on high-quality outputs. 2. One day, Alex's manager sets a deadline that requires Alex to finish a project much more quickly than usual. The timeframe is so tight that delivering the work on time will result in a notable drop in quality. 3. Alex is now faced with a difficult choice: - Option A: Meet the deadline but sacrifice the quality of the work, potentially harming the company's reputation and betraying its values, or failing to meet client expectations. - Option B: Take more time to ensure the work meets the usual high standards, but miss the deadline, which could lead to conflict with management or even penalties for late delivery.
This situation puts Alex in a moral bind. Upholding one ethical principle (commitment to quality) would lead to a violation of another (respect for deadlines). Both options have negative consequences that affect different stakeholders, including the company, its clients, and Alex's personal integrity and job security.