According To Robert Middlekauff, what is one way Thomas Paine’s common sense promoted support for independence?

History · Middle School · Thu Feb 04 2021

Answered on

According to Robert Middlekauff, one way Thomas Paine's "Common Sense" promoted support for independence was by presenting the argument in a clear, straightforward, and compelling manner that appealed to the average colonist. Middlekauff might point out that Paine used plain language that was accessible to a wide audience, which was a departure from the more academic and complex prose that characterized other writings of the time. Paine challenged the authority of the British government and the monarchy, arguing for the natural rights of individuals and the need for a republic. This resonated with the colonists' increasing dissatisfaction with British rule, helping to ignite revolutionary sentiments leading up to the American Revolution.

Extra: "Common Sense," published in 1776, was a pivotal pamphlet that captured the attention of the American colonists and influenced their views on breaking away from British rule. Thomas Paine critiqued the concept of hereditary monarchy and made a strong case for independence and republican government. He argued from a practical standpoint, highlighting the economic and political disadvantages of remaining connected to Britain, contributing to a surge of popular support for the idea of independence.

Paine's ability to communicate complex political ideas in an easily understood form was significant. He eschewed the scholarly language that many of his contemporaries used, opting instead for straightforward arguments that could be understood by people of varying levels of education and literacy. This strategic approach allowed "Common Sense" to spread rapidly and have a broad and profound impact, helping to sway public opinion in favor of revolution. It's often cited as a key factor that led to the support for independence and the success of the American Revolution. Thomas Paine laid out a vision for a new kind of government where people had the power rather than kings, which was an incredibly revolutionary idea at the time.

Related Questions