3. What new information does source 5 provide about the opportunities and obstacles relate to humans consuming cow's milk? What claims made in source 4 does source 5 corroborate?
Answered on
To give a precise answer to your question, I would need to have access to the actual content of sources 4 and 5. Since you haven’t provided the content of these sources, I can only give you a generalized response that suggests how to approach such a comparison.
When analyzing two sources for information about human consumption of cow's milk, focus on identifying the points where the two sources agree (corroboration) and where they offer new insight or present obstacles and opportunities (new information).
For instance, if source 4 states that cow's milk is a good source of calcium vital for human bone health, and source 5 also mentions the calcium benefits, it corroborates the claim about the nutritional benefit of milk for humans.
However, source 5 might provide new information such as genetic factors, like lactose intolerance, that create obstacles for some humans in consuming cow’s milk. It could also discuss advances in dairy farming practices that have improved the safety of milk consumption or environmental concerns related to milk production that present new challenges.
By comparing the information in this manner, you pinpoint what is corroborated regarding opportunities such as nutritional benefits and what new information is provided on obstacles, such as genetic intolerances or environmental concerns.